PFF grades: Jaguars best and worst performers from Week 3 win

By admin — In News — September 28, 2026

   ​Following the Jacksonville Jaguars’ Week 3 win over New England, here is a look at which players received the best and worst PFF grades.Now, before we dive into all that, I do want to mention that while PFF’s grading system is certainly helpful at quantifying a player’s performance, it is not the be-all and end-all when it comes to evaluations. It is one tool out of many that are out there and should be treated as such.For some context around these grades, below is the grading scale.39.9 or less: Poor90.0+: Elite80-89.9: High quality70-79.9: Good60-69.9: Above average50-59.9: Average40-49.9: Below averageJaguars’ 5 highest-graded players v. PatriotsLT Anton Harrison: 89.3WR Jakobi Meyers: 79.9WR Parker Washington: 77.3RB Chris Rodriguez: 74.0RB Bhayshul TutenMeyers and Washington led the Jaguars in receiving, while both also found the end zone. The run game, led by Tuten and Rodriguez, was very efficient. Harrison allowed only one quarterback pressure.Jaguars’ 5 lowest-graded players v. PatriotsDT DaVon Hamilton: 87.7DE Josh Hines-Allen: 83.9LB Branson Combs: 81.7LB Ventrell Miller: 75.0S Eric Murray: 69.0Hamilton was again productive, logging a sack while continuing to be a force in the run game. Hines-Allen had one pressure but graded out very well in the run game. Combs and Miller allowed a combined 25 yards in coverage on six targets. Murray’s grade was bolstered by his performance in the run game.Jaguars’ 3 lowest-graded players vs. PatriotsRB Ameer Abdullah: 41.0TE Nate Boerkircher: 45.5RT Cole Van Lanen: 46.7Abdullah played only seven snaps, and it was his pass-blocking grade that lowered his overall grade. Boerkircher was 0-for-1 when targeted and penalized once. Van Lanen allowed three pressures and a sack.This article originally appeared on Jaguars Wire: PFF grades: Jaguars best and worst performers from Week 3 win  

Content Source: Yahoo News

Image Credit: Getty Images

All rights to the news content and images belong to their respective copyright owners.