Are tennis players right to protest over prize money?

Many of the world’s top tennis players will continue their prize money protest by further restricting media opportunities at Wimbledon – but are they right to?
After all, it was just a couple of weeks ago that Wimbledon announced a 20% increase in prize money – taking the total sum of the pot to £64.2m.
Advertisement

Leading players, including world number ones Aryna Sabalenka and Jannik Sinner, will not only limit the time they offer at the forthcoming media weekend, but are also planning to restrict post-match appearances to 15 minutes throughout the first week of the Championships, which start on Monday.
Reigning men’s champion Sinner has previously said the issue is “about respect”, while Sabalenka says both sides must come together to reach “mutually beneficial solutions”.
But after Wednesday’s announcement, the All England Club (AELTC) said it was “surprised and disappointed” by the latest move, while BBC pundit Andrew Castle, speaking on Wimbledon qualifying coverage, said it was “tone deaf” of the players.
So, what exactly are the players asking for, how will those protests look at Wimbledon, and are they being reasonable in their demands?
Advertisement

Players to expand prize money protest at Wimbledon

Players are asking for a higher share of Grand Slam revenue to be dedicated to prize money, while they also want contributions to their benefit pot and a wider say in issues such as scheduling.
The key number players were asking each Grand Slam to reach this year is a 16% slice of each tournament’s revenue to be devoted to prize money – with that figure increasing to 22% by 2030.
The players want a higher ratio of revenue in acknowledgement of their contribution towards the financial success of the tournaments, with more money trickling down the draws.
Player welfare is another area of concern, particularly how much the Grand Slams contribute to pension, healthcare and maternity pots.
Advertisement

But the players also want increased consultation in key decisions regarding issues such as scheduling, late night finishes and elongated tournaments.
Taking last year’s revenue of £427m, and adjusting for inflation, that demand to see 16% of revenue committed to prize money would equate to a pot of over £70m at Wimbledon in 2026.
Such an amount would have been a 34% rise on the £53.5m prize money offered in 2025.
Instead, Wimbledon has expanded this year’s pot by 20% – and the total prize fund of £64.2m is the largest annual increase in the event’s history.
Advertisement

That includes £3.6m for the singles champions, and £80,000 for first-round losers, but still remains about £7m short of the amount players had been hoping for.

Players welcome ‘genuine step forward’ on Wimbledon pay

Prize money increased by 9.5% at this year’s French Open, and by 16% at the Australian Open in January.
Players protested with a 15-minute limit on media duties at Roland Garros, which was meant to symbolise the 15% of revenue the French Open currently offers.
The total revenue of Tennis Australia in 2025 was A$697.2m (£346.21m), meaning the Australian Open prize fund was also about 15% of that amount.
Discussions will take place with executives from the US Tennis Association (USTA) as they finalise their prize money offer for the US Open, which begins on 30 August.
Advertisement

Sabalenka was among the players to protest at the prize money on offer by cutting short a pre-tournament news conference at this year’s French Open.
Several other leading players – including top-ranked men’s player Sinner and four-time French Open champion Iga Swiatek – also followed the ‘work-to-rule’ directive during a pre-tournament media day.
The players will go one step further at Wimbledon by not only limiting the time they offer during the pre-tournament media weekend, but also restricting their post-match appearances to 15 minutes during the first week.
Advertisement

Primary broadcast partners like the BBC and ESPN are likely to be most affected.
Once again, the 15-minute limit is meant to roughly reflect the 15% of revenue currently allocated to prize money across the sport’s four Grand Slam tournaments.
That decision has been taken despite the players welcoming Wimbledon’s 20% increase as a “genuine and significant step forward”.
Grand Slam rules state that all main-draw players are required to participate in “feature media opportunities” before and during the tournament “in order to help drive engagement with the sport”.
Advertisement

Media sessions are meant to “enable players to put across their opinions on their performance and provide valuable exposure to the media and fans”.
At Roland Garros, many of the leading players who were protesting conducted a press conference followed by just one television interview.
A player can be fined up to £50,000 if they do not appear at all – unless a valid reason has been communicated to the governing bodies.
The players who fulfilled their core commitments at the French Open, but left after 15 minutes, were not punished.
The Grand Slams argue that revenue generated can be a misleading figure, as the costs of running a major tournament are huge and investment is required in warm-up tournaments, stadia and player facilities.
Advertisement

All four Grand Slams have made huge investment in their grounds and facilities in recent years – and part of the AELTC’s ongoing nine-figure refurbishment of its Millennium Building includes significant upgrade to player gyms, recovery areas, lounges and restaurants.
Elsewhere, the USTA is in the process of building a $250m (£189.7m) player performance centre with expanded warm-up areas, locker rooms and dining facilities.
The Slams also invest heavily in warm-up tournaments – the AELTC says it has spent over £60m in supporting grass-court events since 2019 – and into grassroots tennis in their respective countries.
Each slam contributes $750,000 (£572,302) a year to the Grand Slam Player Development Programme, with major winners Elena Rybakina, Li Na and Gustavo Kuerten among the players to have benefitted.

World number one Aryna Sabalenka has reached the semi-finals at Wimbledon three times [Getty Images]
Saying thank you very much for a 20% annual increase before escalating the protest to another level shows the confidence the players, and their representatives, are feeling.
Advertisement

The average UK employee can currently expect a 3.4% annual pay rise, and with first-round losers at Wimbledon guaranteed to take home £80,000, sympathy among the general public is likely to be in short supply.
But for the players this is not about the annual increase, but about getting a higher percentage of the revenue they help the All England Club generate.
The AELTC counters with the argument that revenue does not take into account their costs, or investment in infrastructure and other grass-court events.
But the players feel emboldened, and will not mourn over lost media opportunities, especially if they can avoid being fined.
Advertisement

The French Open prize money increase was in single digits, but players received 16% at the Australian Open and expect this year’s US Open to at least match the 20% rise they offered last year.
They are slowly but surely getting what they want on pay, although are asking for an extra 1.5% of revenue every year until 2030.
Those figures may not be delivered across the board, so can the issue be solved by negotiation, or will it revert to a game of bluff in which players threaten strike action – and more convincingly than they have to date?

Live scores, results and order of play

Get tennis news sent straight to your phone