​Motorsport photoOne of the most eye-catching innovations of the first half of the 2026 Formula 1 season has been the rotating rear wing, quickly dubbed the Macarena wing by Ferrari team principal Frederic Vasseur.Ferrari was the first to unveil the concept during winter testing and managed to surprise several rivals – including McLaren – with the innovative solution.At that point, Red Bull was already working on its own version behind the scenes. Technical director Pierre Wache stressed that the inspiration had not come from Ferrari and that Red Bull’s concept works differently, which is indeed the case as, among other things, it rotates in the opposite direction.Red Bull simply did not manage to get its rotating wing fully operational in time for the start of the season, meaning it was first used in Miami.
Read Also:
McLaren “disappointed” not to pick up rotating rear wing as quickly as Ferrari
The initial race weekends passed without problems for both the Ferrari and Red Bull designs, but the Macarena wings came under increased scrutiny following Verstappen’s two consecutive crashes in Spielberg and Silverstone.The FIA subsequently asked both Red Bull and Ferrari for additional information. That was not specifically directed at the Scuderia, but was simply a way of treating both teams equally, as they were the two outfits that had raced with the concept up to that point.Moreover, it was important for the FIA to fully understand the specifics of both systems, as more and more teams are developing their own versions. McLaren has already tested a rotating wing and plans to race it during “one of the first weekends after the summer break”.Nikolas Tombazis says the FIA is happy for the novel wings to stay in F1Nikolas Tombazis says the FIA is happy for the novel wings to stay in F1The FIA has now told a select group of media, including Motorsport.com, that it will not take action against the overall Macarena wing concept.”When the first such design appeared, we wanted to make sure that it is entirely safe,” FIA single-seater director Nikolas Tombazis said.”And that consisted of various requirements, as in many complicated systems and engineering teams deploying what is called an FMEA analysis, which is failure mode.”That assessment was not only about the prescribed closing time, but also the subsequent behaviour of the wing and the rest of the car – as the closing time alone is not sufficient and the airflow does not immediately reattach after the wing closes.”We went into quite a lot of dialogue to ensure that we felt that these designs were safe.”Mainly, we wanted to be sure that there was never a risk of, let’s say, a hydraulic failure, meaning that the wing is staying open and could not come back to a closed position.”And also, we wanted to make sure that it does so in a very short amount of time. That it doesn’t go through a very slow movement, which can then unsettle the car.”Ferrari was the first to bring its 180 degree wing to the t