​Stephen Lew/Imagn Images
This story originally appeared in Friday’s edition of The A Block, Awful Announcing’s daily newsletter covering the latest sports media news, analysis, and commentary. You can sign up to stay ahead of the biggest developments across the sports media landscape.
The race to control the NBA’s future local streaming hub appears to be underway.
For those who need a quick reset, the NBA is working toward the creation of a centralized streaming destination for local game broadcasts, a plan that mirrors what Major League Baseball has also been exploring. As the regional sports network model continues to deteriorate, both leagues are searching for a more stable way to distribute local games to fans. The basic concept is straightforward: build a single digital marketplace where fans can access their local team broadcasts without needing a traditional cable or satellite television package.
Most NBA teams already offer some form of direct-to-consumer streaming option for in-market viewers. But the league’s broader ambition is to bring those local streaming rights together under one larger umbrella and then sell or license that package to a major platform. The hope is that centralizing these rights will create a more valuable product and help teams recover at least some of the local media revenue they have lost as regional sports networks have weakened or collapsed.
Whether that strategy can fully replace the money teams once received from RSNs remains uncertain. Still, for many franchises, it may be the best available path forward. Teams that have already moved away from regional sports networks have often had to accept dramatic reductions in local media rights revenue, in some cases seeing those payments fall by as much as 70 percent. That kind of financial decline has forced both the NBA and MLB to rethink how local broadcasts should be packaged, sold, and delivered in the streaming era.
There are reasons for the leagues to believe a centralized streaming model could succeed. A single hub would make local broadcasts easier for fans to find and purchase, while also giving a major technology or media company a large bundle of live sports inventory. For the NBA in particular, this week may have marked the beginning of a serious competition among major platforms for the rights to host that future local streaming product.
Earlier this week, NBA commissioner Adam Silver addressed the league’s plans for local broadcasts and identified the 2027-28 season as the target launch window for a centralized streaming platform. Until then, the 13 NBA teams that had been tied to the now-defunct FanDuel Sports Networks are expected to operate under one-year bridge agreements for the upcoming season. Four of those teams have already announced new deals with local over-the-air broadcast partners, while nine others have yet to reveal their plans.
Looking ahead to 2027-28, two early contenders appear to be positioning themselves for the NBA’s local streaming rights. On Wednesday, Sports Business Journal reported that YouTube is currently viewed as the “leading candidate” to secure the league’s central local broadcast hub. According to that report, at least 22 NBA teams could be realistic participants in such a package. That group would include the 13 former FanDuel Sports Network teams, the four franchises still connected to NBC Sports regional sports networks, which appear to be winding down, and the five teams that had already shifted to over-the-air broadcast arrangements before this offseason.
A package of 22 teams would represent a significant share of the league and could give the NBA’s local streaming hub enough scale to attract a major partner like YouTube. The more teams that join, the stronger the offering becomes for both fans and distributors. A platform with that level of inventory could market itself as the primary destination for in-market NBA games, potentially giving cord-cutters a simpler alternative to the patchwork of RSNs, local channels, and team-specific streaming services that exists today.
Still, building a truly leaguewide local streaming platform will not be easy. The NBA’s most valuable local broadcast properties may be the hardest to bring into the fold. Teams such as the Los Angeles Lakers and New York Knicks still have lucrative local media rights deals, making it far less likely that they would quickly abandon their current arrangements for a centralized model. Those glamour franchises remain among the few teams still benefiting from the old RSN structure, which gives them less incentive to join a new shared platform unless the financial terms are compelling.
MLB is facing a similar challenge as it works toward its own local streaming solution. Both leagues are trying to solve the same problem: how to preserve local broadcast revenue while making games more accessible to fans who have moved away from traditional pay television. The decline of regional sports networks has created urgency, but it has also opened the door for companies like YouTube, Amazon, Apple, and other major streaming platforms to become more deeply involved in local sports media.
For the NBA, the next few years will be critical. The league must navigate existing contracts, persuade teams to participate, and identify the right technology or media partner to host its future local streaming hub. If the plan works, it could reshape how fans watch in-market NBA games and provide a blueprint for other leagues dealing with the same regional sports network crisis. If it falls short, teams may continue to face shrinking local media revenue and a fragmented distribution system that frustrates fans.
For now, the jockeying has begun, and YouTube appears to have an early edge. But with the NBA targeting 2027-28 for the launch of its centralized local streaming platform, the competition for one of the most important packages in sports media is likely only getting started.