​Motorsport photoWhile Formula 1 insists – based on its own Formula 1 Fan Voice programme – that fans are enjoying the racing, drivers have been far more critical of the 2026 regulations so far.One of the biggest talking points emerged at Spa-Francorchamps, where Oscar Piastri highlighted the issue of drivers being surprised by their own power units.During qualifying, the Australian lost significant time on the straights compared to team-mate Lando Norris, with McLaren initially unable to explain why.When team principal Andrea Stella held his media session on Saturday evening, the Italian explained that the power unit settings on both cars were virtually identical, leading him to point towards the “self-learning elements” of the power unit.This is not Artificial Intelligence as most people know it, but it does involve forward-thinking algorithms that learn from lap to lap and even during a lap. If there is a deviation from the ideal energy management, these algorithms can adapt and determine the optimal deployment strategy for the remainder of the lap.There are, however, two problematic aspects. First, drivers do not have everything under their own control. Stella explained that these systems are sensitive to driver input – meaning that still plays a major role – but the same applies to external factors beyond the driver’s control, such as changes in wind conditions or grip levels.The second issue is that drivers can be surprised by their own power unit, something Piastri addressed at Spa: “It sucks. I can’t really say it any other way than that. When you’ve got qualifying grids decided by computers behaving or misbehaving, it’s a pretty crap way of going racing.”‘I don’t think humans can rationally control these parameters’Lewis Hamilton, Ferrari, Oscar Piastri, McLarenLewis Hamilton, Ferrari, Oscar Piastri, McLarenSpeaking to a select group of media, including Motorsport.com, FIA single-seater director Nikolas Tombazis said he understands the drivers’ frustration regarding these self-learning elements.”Well, it is true and their comments are understandable,” he said. “I think their comments are a consequence of the fact that energy is limited and therefore how you best manage it becomes supercritical. And then the various strategies that need to be deployed to do it are related to that.”That raises the question of whether these self-learning elements could simply be banned, allowing drivers to control deployment entirely themselves through a button on the steering wheel.After all, Article B1.8.1 of the regulations states: “The driver must drive the F1 car alone and unaided.”Tombazis believes, however, that banning such algorithms would be an overly simplistic idea.”I don’t think you could go to that extreme,” he added. “First of all, if it was just really on-off for the driver whenever they want and as much as they like, then they would use all energy on corner exit for a very limited amount of time. And then the effects that people are