​On Tuesday, several members of the United States Congress wrote to WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert, expressing concern over what they described as “repeated acts of unnecessary physical hostility and violence” directed at Indiana Fever star Caitlin Clark. The letter, issued by the Republican Study Committee, began with a formal salutation: “Dear Commissioner Engelbert.”
In their message, the lawmakers lauded Clark for transforming women’s sports and for inspiring a new generation of young girls to engage in athletics. They noted that she has become one of the most influential figures in the history of women’s basketball and described her as the face of the WNBA. The letter asserted that Clark has substantially boosted fan interest, driven record television ratings, and attracted new corporate sponsors, with millions of casual fans tuning in to watch her play. However, the authors argued that what those fans often witness goes beyond competitive play: it includes repeated acts of unnecessary physical hostility and violence.
According to the letter, Clark has been hip-checked, poked in the eye, and struck in the throat during games. The lawmakers contended that these incidents exceed ordinary physicality and that the WNBA and its officiating have too often failed to address them or hold players accountable. They also cited a recent social media post in which a player appeared to endorse violence against Clark, claiming it further fueled concerns about the culture surrounding these incidents. Additionally, they referenced troubling reports suggesting that many of the attacks on Clark may be racially motivated.
The letter urged Engelbert, as Commissioner, to ensure that every player competes in a safe and professional environment both on and off the court—free from violence, discrimination, or retaliation. The lawmakers stated that if discrimination or retaliation is occurring and creating a hostile work environment, they would support any appropriate investigations by federal agencies such as the Department of Justice, the Department of Labor, or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. They warned that if proven, such conduct could violate federal civil rights laws.
Three specific questions concluded the letter, with a deadline of July 24 for Engelbert’s responses: What review mechanism does the league have for addressing physical hostility and violence on the court? How will the league hold players accountable for overly aggressive actions on the court, including those directed at Caitlin Clark? What steps are being taken to protect WNBA players from online harassment and off-court threats?
On Wednesday, the Fever organization issued a response, and it is unlikely the congressional signatories will be pleased with how the franchise handled the matter. The Fever stated that neither the organization nor Caitlin Clark had any interaction with the congressional group and that they were unaware of the letter. The team’s statement, shared with the Fever’s reporter Chloe Peterson, emphasized that they have been clear in their public comments and in ongoing dialogue with the League about the priority of player safety. The Fever also noted their commitment to maintaining safety for their players and staff as they continue their work in representing the franchise and its fans.